Photo by: PNA

Busy is Better: Debunking the Over-Scheduled Myth

Photo by: PNA

Current wisdom says that flooding kids’ schedules with extracurricular activities like sports practices, music lessons and art classes, may not allow any time for kids to be kids, but are today’s so called “hyper-parents” really doing anything wrong?

Determined to provide their children with all of the opportunities their calendars and checkbooks can bear, today’s parents, who just a few years ago were urged to sign their kids up for everything, are now being scolded for doing precisely that. The pace of over-full schedules is damaging American children. Busy is bad. The blades of helicopter parents must be clipped and calendars emptied so everyone could return to the slower, simpler, happier times of the past. But do “simpler times” really exist? In theory it’s a nice image of everyone linking arms and singing around the piano, but who really does that? The best family moments come unexpectedly and are just as likely to come when everyone is together at some kid event.

Many experts also believe that busy isn’t bad. In fact, busy is good and perhaps, busy is even better for families. In 2006 Yale psychologist Joseph Mahoney looked at 2,100 5- to 18-year-olds and concluded that the more time kids spent in organized activities, the better their grades, the higher their self-esteem and the richer their relationships with their parents. Even kids who spent more than 20 hours a week in activities did not suffer, he said. (Mahoney, J.S., Harris, A.L., & Eccles, J.S. Organized Activity Participation, Positive Youth Development, and the Over-Scheduling Hypothesis. Social Policy Report, 20(4). The Over-Scheduling Myth)

Dr. Joshua Coleman from the Council on Contemporary Families says that kids today are actually closer to their parents than in past generations. He cautions against revisionist history – reminding families that parents today (both married and single) are spending more time teaching, caring and playing with their kids than parents did in the supposed golden age of the family in the 1950s/1960s. He adds that “kids really do feel the investment and sense of care that their parents are putting into them.”

And in return, parents feel fortunate to be able to provide a range of opportunities for their kids (many they didn’t have growing up). Just last month, Cozi.com, a free online service providing tools for busy families to manage the chaos of daily life, surveyed more than 200 of its users to find out how they feel their current schedules are impacting their children and family relationships. Sixty-eight percent of Cozi’s users reported that they feel happy about their children’s level of activity. Another 88 percent responded that, by involving their kids in a variety of different activities, they are providing opportunities for growth and development, increasing self-esteem, and expanding their social circles.

For the cynics who claim that a busy schedule equates to a disconnected family, it actually may achieve just the opposite with families making a more conscious effort to stay connected when the calendar is full. Despite everyone going in different directions, scheduled activities can allow parents and children to come together and enjoy the best aspect of life.

What do you think — is busy better for YOUR family?

Jenny Deam is a freelance journalist. Romi Lassally is a busy Mother of three and a contributing Cozi Editor.

Editor’s Note: This post was sponsored by Cozi, Family life. Simplified.

Like This Article

Like Mamapedia

Learn From Moms Like You

Get answers, tips, deals, and amazing advice from other Moms.

93 Comments

Busy is not bad, but thoughtful choosing of activities is better for child and mom. I am a grandma now and my mother observed my brother's kids actually rested and played outdoors on the 3 acres left of our farm.
If you are driving children to lessons every day, unless that child is a gift olympic athlete and has the desire to practice every day, I think you are too busy...

See entire comment

I would completely rather my son be busy with constructive activities when he is teen (he's 2 now), then hanging out in a gangway of private property getting high. I met some kids over the all at my apartment building doing that and I asked them if they were involved in any activities after school and they all said, "NO"- Touble, trouble, trouble. My son is starting lil Kickers today and I will keep that going until he's out of HS.

Everything in moderation - that's the rule to live by in so many aspects of life. For our family, it works for this issue as well. My kids each have 1-2 activities, depending on what's available, and what interests them. They love it, and we love seeing them happy, active, and learning new things.

I think that you can find a balance of scheduled activities and time to be a kid. Cutting down on TV time certainly helps with this. We subscribe to the notion that one weekly activity is enough. At least while they're gradeschool or younger - or until they can choose for themselves. That gives us flexibility for last minute plans and hopefully we won't be overlapping too much. It also makes sure mommy and daddy aren't overly stressed trying to fit everything in.

Totally agree and nice to know there's a little research behind it. I grew up that way and feel my life is richer for it. :)

I don't believe this at all. Of course some activities and opportunities to learn are beneficial for children and their families, but when children are running from one activity to the next, they tend to eat less healthy meals (healthy food takes time to prepare), get less sleep, and have less than enough down time...

See entire comment

Great article. I believe that there should be a balance. There is an extreme both ways. Each family should know their limits and stick to them. We are a family of eight with little children, so we are not doing a great deal of extra activities, and the ones that we do participate in, we can do together. When the older children are able to help with the driving, we might do a few more individual activities.

This post is an interesting one for me to consider. I really think so much depends on the kids and their personality. For an introvert, like my son, it is important to have alone time where no one is directing you. When we have signed our son up for organized activities that occupy more than 1-2 nights per week, he is tired and cranky. He thrives on having free choice to design his own imaginative games. And he does. He also loves to pull out science kits, art supplies, etc...

See entire comment

I think it's a balancing act, and I think one litmus test is, do you ever have time to share a meal together? I recently talked to a mom who said her family hasn't shared meals together in years, that they only do this on special occasions, like holidays, and I think that truly is sad... You're missing the point of slower schedules if you think it's about "linking arms and gathering around the piano"...

See entire comment

We parents overload our kids because we overload ourselves. Where we’re missing the boat is that kids need time not only to “be kids,” but also to spend time with themselves...

See entire comment

All of you are experts at nothing. I've watched my daughter kill her son's scholastic brilliance with all these styrofoam activities. She pushes him into every sport, boy scouts, forces him to go camping with every group he belongs to. She is living through him. But, if a child is going to grow up to be creative and live up to their potential they need to have their own time to think, read, play on their own.
I ought to know...

See entire comment

First, I disagree that parents spend more time with their kids than they did in the 50s and 60s, when I grew up. It is true that fathers most likely spend more time with their kids now, but during that "Golden Age" mothers were either stay-at-home or had jobs designed around their children's schedules. I remember large Sunday dinners, Sunday afternoon drives, my dad teaching me how to fly a kite and ride a bike. Television wasn't a major presence in our home. The internet was non-existent...

See entire comment

I really liked this article and believe in involving kids in activities. It leaves them less time for other unproductive and dangerous activities (hint, hint). However, it feels like its one sided. I think there should be research done on the kids who had a "busy" childhood to see how THEY felt about their busy schedules. Just a thought. :o)

I believe families can figure out ways to stay connected and have quality time regardless. It is good to have children involved in a diverse range of activities. However, it is also important to allow kids some time to develop their imaginations and foster creative play. Children benefit from figuring out ways to entertain themselves when they have unstructured time in self directed activities that don't involve electronic games, television, etc...

See entire comment

Great article! As a child I was allowed NO free time. The oldest of 5 children, I had my time scheduled 24/7.

Now that I am a mom, I feel a balance is in order for children. They need to have some down time, some dream time, and some time to get in touch with what they want to do.

My daughter is happier with a balance between busy and bored. I try to schedule activities for her that will broaden her horizons but allow for free expression...

See entire comment

Leave a Comment

Required
Required (will not be published)
Required (to prove you're human)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on topic and not abusive
For Updates and Special Promotions
Follow Us
Want to become a contributor?
Want to become a contributor?

If you'd like to contribute to the Wisdom of Moms on Mamapedia, please sign up here to learn more: Sign Up

Recent Voices Posts

See all