S.J.
Everything I've read says it is not a good idea to try VBAC because the uterus wall (where the old incision was) can rupture or something. Especially after 2. If I were in your position, I'd opt for the C-section, I think there is a good chance you'd end up having to have one anyway if the vaginal route isn't going smoothly. I have no personal experience to share with you, as I have not had a c-section, I've just had one vaginal birth (very painful, by the way, because the drugs stopped working in some spots, I had a vaginal tear and subsequent stitches, that was the worst pain the week after delivery, thank goodness for the drugs!). Don't think you would be "missing out" on "natural delivery" or something like that, trust me, it wasn't a fun experience for me! Having to push over and over for a long time was not fun. And NOT having to go through hours of labor (c-section), that sounds great to me!! I like to have everything in my life planned perfectly, and so when I suddenly went into labor and had to go to the hospital, the whole time I was freaking out because I was not in control. I personally would feel better if I had more control, like scheduling a c-secition so you can be 100% ready. If your concern is just not wanting to be cut open unneccessarily, as you mentioned, that is certainly a good reason to want to do a VBAC, but a repeat c-section is still what I personally would opt to do if I were in your shoes. I'm just going by what I remember reading in books or articles by medical professionals. Although, your last c-section did not sound fun at all. But I think the general idea is that there are fewer risks for complications with the repeat c-section that with a VBAC. But good luck, I probably wasn't much help, sorry, but I thought I'd share my view as someone who gave birth vaginally.