RB, I highly suggest Dr. Paul Fleiss, who was recommended to us by our amazing midwife, Tonya Brooks. Dr. Fleiss is truly one of the most amazing pediatricians my husband and I have ever met! He grants so much kindness to children and has such a big heart. We love that he passionately advocates nursing, always recommends natural remedies, and highly supports our decision not to vaccinate or circumcise our
dazzling son, Dylan Orion, who so loves him and his staff.
Here's Dr. Fleiss' data:
1824 N. Hillhurst Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90027.
Phone: ###-###-####
Also, Dr. Jay Gordon and Dr. Lauren Feder are also amazing!
Here's their data:
Dr. Jay Gordon
###-###-####
http://www.drjaygordon.com
Dr. Lauren Feder
###-###-####
http://www.drfeder.com/
Then regarding the flu shot: According to CNN, "The flu shot is only as good as the educated guesses of a group of vaccine researchers across the globe. Every February, they try to predict which flu viruses will work their evil during the next fall and winter. Their three top choices are put into the vaccine. The CDC claims that vaccine will be 70 to 90 percent effective against just those strains of flu." In fact, this year's formulation consists of three viral strains: Influenza A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1), Influenza A/Brisbane/10-2007 (H3N2) and Influenza B/Florida/4/2006 based on what the CDC feels will match those viruses circulating in the community. It's hoped that these smart scientists who get together with the vaccine producers make the right call but sometimes they don't, partly because the virus mutates from year to year changing its identity so often that it frequently outsmarts our body's immune systems and seeks ways around the defenses we prepare in the way of flu vaccines. Case in point, last season's flu shot was a good match for only about 40% of last year's flu viruses."
And, according to the CDC, "Yes, the majority of influenza vaccines distributed in the United States currently contain thimerosal as a preservative. However, some contain only trace amounts of thimerosal and are considered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be preservative-free. Manufacturers of preservative-free flu vaccine use
thimerosal early in the manufacturing process. The thimerosal gets diluted as the vaccine goes through the steps in processing. By the end of the manufacturing process there is not enough thimerosal left in the vaccine to act as a preservative and the vaccine is labeled "preservative-free"." http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/thimerosal.htm
"For the 2008-09 season, there is one product licensed for 6-23 month old children (the product is thimerosal-free). For children between the ages of 2 and 5 years of age, there are three products available that are thimerosal-free (sanofi's Fluzone; MedImmune's FluMist) or preservative-free (trace thimerosal- [Novartis's Fluvirin])."
And, YES! It looks like "thimerosal free" flu vaccines are truly THIMEROSAL FREE. But, then my only concern would be the ingredients they're using in this flu shot, such as Chick embryos and formaldehyde (that's right - the stuff they embalm humans with and classified as a known cancer-causing substance). That, to me, is scary, especially
when you're injecting this into a sweet baby who's brain is still developing or a pregnant MAMA.
And, you have to watch this video...FUNNY BUT TRUE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWfCnjnShnM
Please know that I send this data with love, and I'd love to help however I can.
With love,
L. (MAMA to healthy and non~vaccinated 17 month old Dylan Orion.......29 September 2007) : )))