Seems like Ann Arbor uses the same kindergarten curriculum as Sterling Heights does. I have a feeling, though, that my daughter's teacher is implemented more than the outline you mentioned. The teacher spent the first semester giving every child assessments on sounds, letter recognition, sight words, rhyming sounds/letters, and similar items. When we went to conferences, she took the entire 30 minutes explaining all of the assessments and where my DD scored. Now, this week, our DD is getting her first book "just right for her," which she is to read at home and then demonstrate her ability with the book to the teacher, and then the next book's level is determined on her performance.
I think this approach is a combination of whole reading and using phonics. As a high school English teacher, I am impressed with the fact that the teachers listen to these kids read daily, assess the child's ability at that level, and then decide which next level is best for the student. All 25 of them!
For math, the kids are now writing "math stories" where they write simple addition and subtraction problems and draw accompanying icon problems (one smiley face plus two smiley faces equals three smiley faces). I am happy to see this. We have been getting these "Everyday Math" sheets, and I must admit that I have not been able to keep up with this homework. I look at it as supplemental activities rather than the main event. We do a lot of organic math, like count in tens or count items and other things like that.
When I think back to learning to read in first grade with Dick and Jane (Seriously! Dr, Seuss had been published, but I never saw one of those books at school!), and learning to add without manipulatives, I think it is amazing what kids do in kindergarten now. I complement what my daughter is learning, but I am not fretting about it. I have been reading H-O-U-R-S of chapter books to her lately while she acts out the plot or draws pictures of the events (on her own volition). She's going to get it.
Some kids learn better with whole language, and some learn better with phonics. Visual learners prefer breaking up the words into parts, and kinesthetic and spatial kids prefer whole words. I haven't read this next idea anywhere, but given that the visual learners probably conquer reading at a younger age, it seems that phonics helps kids read faster. Since kinesthetic/spatial learners probably start reading later, it seems like they are slow learners or are behind, but they are not; it seems like they'd learn earlier if they use phonics, but most likely they won't. These kids need the whole picture before they read fluently, and they develop this a bit later. The kindergarten teacher's challenge is to find out what kind of learners she or he has in order to help the kids read.
I guess I would continue to support the teacher so that your child will aim to please the teacher. And then if you want (and your child will cooperate, as you do not want to apply so much pressure that reading stops being fun), add some of your own approaches.
I enjoy this activity with my child. I hope every parent does.