I have good news and bad news.
The good news is that he has no experience so he will be 'cheap'. This may be attractive to some districts since hiring someone with zero experience is significantly less expensive than hiring someone who has been working for a while. In this economy, a veteran teacher could be absolutely awesome and a great teacher but will have absolutely NO chance of getting hired because they are "too expensive".
The bad news is that teaching is tough to get into right now. State and federal governments are either paying the school districts slowly or not at all which has left many districts cash-strapped. Additionally, education in the US is primarily funded at the local level based upon housing values and tax revenues. In other words, since housing values have dropped dramatically so has the amount of tax that can be collected for the schools. Finally, nearly every school district has their reserve funds invested, in bonds, or in savings. Typically they plan several years out, assuming that they'll get <x>% return on their investments. Of course interest rates have fallen like crazy and the reserve funds aren't being built like they used to be. On top of that since tax income has decreased, many districts are depleting their reserve funds rather quickly just to pay the bills.
So yeah, the state of the economy is pretty much forcing school districts to keep things tight. Veteran teachers are being laid off, class sizes are being expanded to squeeze out more teachers, and hiring has been at a minimum. Makes me glad I got in the game 14 years ago BUT it also crushes any plans I have to move to another school if I wanted to - A, no one is hiring and B, I'm too expensive now to even get considered.
I think you're on the right track to be open to moving anywhere in the country. Furthermore, be willing to coach sports or sponsor activities and you'll become a more attractive candidate.