A.S.
Hey R.,
I've read all the responses here, all of them, and I tell you this because I want you to know that I am making an "educated" response to your question. I have two children, almost 5 and almost 3. Sometimes they are "great sleepers," and sometimes they aren't. We never put our kids on a schedule. I worked the first year of my eldest child's life and gave it up because I missed her too much. We took a hit financially, and it isn't always easy to stay home with my kids, but I think it's the right thing for our family. I give you this info because I think it completely informs whatever else I might say to you in reponse to your question. I read Babywise, and everything inside me said "no, not for us." When we were looking for a daycare for our first child, we encountered a 6 week old baby who was being given prune juice for constipation because his mother insisted on sticking to the Babywise schedule. The staffers were instructed to feed him a bottle of formula on a schedule and he was give a certain amount of time in which to finish it, or he was out of luck until the next feeding. At the daycare where we eventually put our daughter, and where I eventually took a job to be close to her, there was a little girl whose mother used Babywise and none of the staffers there felt good about it. This baby would cry to eat and initially we waited to feed her until the scheduled time, per her mother's request, but eventually we chucked the schedule and fed her when she cried to be fed. We put her down for naps whether she was sleepy or not, and she'd lay in that crib for an hour sometimes without sleeping. No one felt good about it. There are mothers who responded to you with the belief that children should learn how to self-soothe and that they should know that they are part of the family, not the center of it. I think the idea of teaching a child to self-soothe is ridiculous. I believe my job as a mother is to nurture my child, and when my children were very young, as yours is, I held them all the time, co-slept with them, fed them when they cried to be fed, essentially followed the "schedule" they set for themselves. This schedule changed as they grew older, and I accomodated it. At my daughter's daycare, they fed her when she was hungry, let her sleep when she was tired, and loved on her a lot. I made sure there was a low child-teacher ratio. There were 3 babies for every woman, and there were 3 women. Incidentally, if you are putting your daughter into a daycare, you should look for one that doesn't allow 13 babies to 2 caregivers, which is the state regulated allowance. Think about why you want her to have a "routine." Is it for you? Is it for her? My children are flexible-they don't "turn into pumpkins" at a certain time each night. They are self-confident and happy and spirited. I think some babies might do fine with Babywise, not because it's a great method, but because their parents are lucky. For some babies, Babywise is an exercise in forcing your child into submission. My in-laws used Babywise with their first child without any problem, but their second child cried and cried until they finally gave in after an hour or so and went to get her. She never napped after that, she was afraid to go to bed, and, at 4, she has been diagnosed as a "sensitive" child. She is a wonderful girl, but extremely insecure in any new environment or situation, sticks to her mother like glue, and cries at the drop of a hat. It was obvious, even when she was a baby, that she had a different personality from her sister, and had her parents responded to that, they might have saved her some difficulty down the road. They, btw, have expressed this themselves. Should children be the center of our lives? Maybe not. But, should they always be required to bend to our needs for sleep or "me time," or predictability? Definitely not, in my opinion. I don't know you, I don't know your personality, but I will say that a good rule of thumb in parenting is to do so with compassion. If your elderly mother were in a room crying for you, would you ignore her? Would you do so under the moniker of making her a "stronger, more self-sufficient" individual? Would you deny her requests for food until you thought she should be hungry? Your baby, your precious, helpless, wide-open to every stimulus and experience, good or bad, piece of you, will teach you, at this point, what she needs if you cue into her. Right now, she wants to be held to sleep. Will you give that to her? Or will you teach her to be "self-sufficient" so you can get the laundry done, or clean the house, or do any of the one million other things you could do if you could just put her down? Both of my kids sleep in their own beds now. My son naps great, although he can forego one if there is something really cool going on that we'd all like to do. There are times now when I think how short the time will be that I can hold their little bodies or nurse all of their hurts, physical and emotional. Already they are so busy and so much their own people. There were times when they were babies that I wished for sleep or just time to myself, I'm only human after all, and now I look at them and long for their babyhood. It all sounds so cliche, and it is, until it's your experience. So, there's my more than two cents. You will not be "setting bad habits" if you hold your daughter when she naps, or have her in your bed, or any other myriad of things that Babywise will eschew. Follow your heart, not your intellect at this point.
A.